MINUTES OF THE CITY OF HEPPNER CITY COUNCIL MEETING

February 14, 2005

 

ATTENDEES:

 

Mayor Tim Van Cleave

City Manager, Jerry Breazeale

 

Council Members:

 

Glenn Baker

Judy Buschke

Tom Wolff

Cindy Doherty

 

Absent:  George Koffler

                Kay Robinson

 

Bill Kuhn, City Attorney

Dan Dunnett, Planning Commission Representative

Bruce Nelson, Public Works Director

Morrow County Sheriff’s Department, Sergeant Phil Morris

Morrow County Sheriff’s Department, Deputy Randy Rayburn

Morrow County Sheriff’s Department, Deputy Justin Slinger

Morrow County Sheriff’s Department, Deputy Adam Bredfield

Heppner Fire Department, Rusty Estes

Heppner Gazette Times, David Sykes

 

Members of the Public:

 

Jerry Healy

Sharon Harrison

Cara Osmin

Diana Ball

Doris Brosnan

Barbara Hayes

Johanne Wood

 

1.  GENERAL BUSINESS

 

      A)  Call to Order.  The February 14, 2005 meeting of the Heppner City Council was called to order by Mayor Tim Van Cleave at 7:00 PM

 

      B)  Pledge of Allegiance:  Councilman Baker led attendees in the Pledge of Allegiance.

 

      C)  Announcements.  Mr. Breazeale announced the following additions to be included in the City Council packet:

 

            1.  Item 5D – Letter from the Morrow County Sheriff’s Department addressing concerns regarding the Heppner contract.

 

            2.  Item 8D – Resolution, Exhibit A, Current Bills, February 2005.

 

            3.  Item 8D -Letter from Ace Consultants, Re:  Bids for the Construction of Heppner Water System Improvements.

 

      D)  Approval of the minutes from the January 10, 2005 Council Meeting, Approval of the Minutes from the January 24, 2005 Goal Setting Session.

 

            1.  January 10, 2005 Council Minutes.  Members reviewed the Council minutes with one typographical error identified on Page 2.  Motion by Mr. Wolff to approve the January 10, with correction of the error.  Seconded by Mrs. Doherty.  Motion Carried.

 

            2.  January 24, 2005 Goal Setting Session.  Mr. Breazeale added that the meeting adjourned at 2:00 PM.  Motion by Mrs. Doherty to approve the minutes.  Seconded by Mr. Baker.  Motion Carried (Mrs. Buschke abstained).

 

      E)  Report from the Planning Commission – Dan Dunnett.  Mr. Dunnett reported the following actions from the February 7, 2005 Planning Commission meeting:

 

            1.  This was the first meeting of the new year.  Officers for 2005 were elected as follows:  Chairman, Dan Dunnett; Vice-Chairman, Rod Wilson.

 

            2.  One Public Hearing was held to approve a variance to change the sign for a new business (Looslie’s Auto Body Repair Shop, 235 Linden Way) and a request for conditional use.  The sign variance was approved authorizing a 64 sq. ft. sign.  Conditional use was approved with the following conditions:  Business hours to be from7:00 AM – 10:00 PM and 45 day limit for storage of vehicles being repaired.  One letter of opposition was received from a property owner in the area. 

 

            3.  Molly Rhea, representing the Lions Club, was in attendance to discuss future plans for the old pool site.

 

            4.  Mr. Breazeale updated the commission on current actions on the flood study. 

 

      F)  Correspondence:

 

            1.  Letter of resignation from JoyceKay Hollomon resigning her position on the Budget Committee for the coming year.

 

            2.  Request from Dick Sargent to close Willow Street both East and West of Main Street on March 19, 2005, 6:00 AM4:00 PM for vehicle displays involved in the St. Paddy’s Cruz-In. 

Motion by Mr. Wolff to approve this request.  Seconded by Mr. Baker.  Motion Carried.

 

            3.  Letter from Joni Robbins, Executive Director, Oregon Trail Camp fire Council, informing the City of their upcoming door-to-door candy sale and requesting permission for Camp Fire members to participate.  Dates for this are January 21, 2005February 28, 2005.

Council members agreed to allow this program.

 

            4.  Publication from Columbia River Channel Coalition, subject:  Columbia River Channel Project.  According to Mr. Breazeale, this issue has economic impact on the State.  Mr. Baker stated that he feels the City should add Heppner to the list of supporters. 

Motion by Mrs. Buschke to support this effort.  Seconded by Mr. Baker.  Motion Carried.

 

2.  COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. 

 

      A)  Oral communications from the public not on the agenda.

 

            1.  Mrs. Johanne Wood.  Mrs. Wood announced that she is attending the meeting to thank the Public Works Department for their work on the Gale and May Street island.  She also discussed the junipers planted at the South end of the island and stated that she would like to see the plants remain since they help to control dust, etc.  She also stated that the trees removed by Public Works were not dedicated to Mr. and Mrs. Gonty.  The only plant that had to do with the Gontys was a lilac tree that was removed.  She stated that the area is much safer since the cleanup.

 

            2.  Sharon Harrison.  Mrs. Harrison announced that she is attending the meeting to request a game license for the Luck of the Irish gaming night during the St. Patrick’s celebration.  According to Mr. Kuhn, this is a fund-raiser for the Chamber of Commerce.  This will be a “Reno-night” type format.  Mrs. Hayes has researched licensing requirements.  She has contacted the State and they mentioned a requirement for an IRS letter.  Mr. Kuhn has a set of the state gaming rules and one of the requirements is a 501C3 with a recognition letter from the IRS in order to obtain such a license.  A sponsor is required to get this license.  There isn’t enough time to get a 501C3 designation.  Since the City is a non-profit organization they can apply for a license without an IRS letter.  According to Mrs. Ball, this is the major fund-raiser for St. Patricks.  Mr. Baker asked Mr. Kuhn if the City of Heppner is the official sponsor do we have to go through the IRS.  According to Mr. Kuhn, the State would recognize the City of Heppner.  This goes through the Oregon Department of Justice.  According to Mrs. Brosnan, this function is run with script and there is no money involved.  The recognized program is Monte Carlo. 

 

Motion by Mr. Wolff that the City put their name on the application to the Oregon Department of Justice for the gaming license for the St. Patricks day evening on Friday night, one day only this year for this event.  Seconded by Mr. Baker.  Motion Carried.

 

      B)  Animal Permit Renewal – Elizabeth Pettibone, 710 Heppner/Spray Hwy., 10 Horses.  Mr. Wolff asked for clarification of the renewal process and whether this had to be advertised.  According to Mr. Breazeale, renewals do not have to be advertised and surrounding property owners do not need to be notified.  There was one complaint last year due to horses getting out of the property.  The horses have been moved and the fence repaired. 

 

Motion by Mrs. Doherty to approve the application.  Seconded by Mr. Wolff.  Motion Carried. 

 

3.  PUBLIC HEARINGS

 

      A)  Resolution No. _____, A Resolution Declaring Certain Property a Nuisance and Ordering Cleanup of Property.  Property address is 165 Linden Way, Map No. 2S 26 26CC, Tax Lot No. 6402.

 

      Discussion.  This action refers to the Breeding Property.  Mr. Breazeale reported that a letter was sent to the Breedings after the last Council Meeting and a courtesy follow-up letter was also sent.  There has been no response.  The letter specifically mentioned articles that needed to be taken care.  Deputy Rayburn stated that he had hand-delivered the courtesy letter to Cory, the Breeding’s son.  Mr. Van Cleave noted that there was no one present at this meeting to represent the Breedings.  He also stated that he had visited Cory Breeding last week to try to encourage him to do some cleaning, but nothing has been done.  Deputy Rayburn displayed recent photos of the property.

 

      Mr. Kuhn stated that he had discussed this issue with Mr. Breazeale last week.  There are a couple of mortgages on the property and any lien placed by the City for cleanup would be below the mortgages.  However, there is another procedure that would allow the City’s lien to work through the court system and declare a court appointed receiver to clean up the property.  This process allows the city to go ahead of the mortgages.  Mr. Kuhn recommends that we go ahead and pass the resolution, but he will contact the mortgage companies to make them aware of this statute.  Mr. Kuhn’s recommendation to the Council is that we allow him to proceed with this process.  Mr. Van Cleave explained that in the past, Deputy Rayburn worked with the Department of Corrections to have a crew clean the property which saves the City money.  Mr. Wolff asked what the process is concerning hauling off valuable goods.  According to Mr. Kuhn, this is a judgment call.  Deputy Rayburn stated that hauling off the unlicensed vehicles is quite costly.  Mr. Kuhn advised waiting on this issue until after he has contacted the mortgage companies.  Mr. Healy asked if County taxes would be under the cleanup costs and Mr. Kuhn stated that they are not. 

 

      Mr. Wolff asked if the cleanup would be done before St. Patricks and the answer is “no.”  Mr. Kuhn stated that the process he is recommending would not be done for some time.  Mrs. Wood inquired about the property lines between the Breeding and Smith properties.  According to Mr. Wolff, the property lines are QUITEvisible from the top of the hill.

 

PUBLIC HEARINGS CLOSED AT 7:35 PM.

 

4.  COUNCIL ACTION

 

      A)  Resolution No. _____, A Resolution Declaring Certain Property a Nuisance and Ordering Cleanup of Property.  Property address is 165 Linden Way, Map No. 2S 26 26CC, Tax Lot No. 6402.

 

      Motion by Mrs. Buschke to pass Resolution 591-05, a Resolution Declaring Certain Property a Nuisance and Ordering Cleanup of Property.  Property address is 165 Linden Way, Map No. 2S 26 26CC, Tax Lot No. 6402.  Seconded by Mr. Baker.  Motion Carried.

 

5.  COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE COUNTY SHERIFF REPRESENTATIVE.

 

      A)  Activity Report.  Deputy Rayburn stated that the Sheriff’s Department is in the process of revising their reporting process and a complete report should be available for the next Council meeting.

 

      B)  Police Commission. 

 

      Discussion:  Mr. Breazeale announced that most of the January 27 meeting was devoted to discussions by Sheriff Matlack as to his plans for the Sheriff’s Department contract.  He plans to discuss a formal presentation to be given to the City Council at the March 2005 meeting.  This will be discussed at the February Police Commission meeting on February 24.  Mr. Breazeale read the February 11, 2005 letter from Sheriff Matlack to the Council members. 

 

      Mr. Breazeale stated that he and Mr. Van Cleave had met with Sheriff Matlack last week to discuss this further.  Some of the concerns Sheriff Matlack has are listed in the January 27 Police Commission minutes.  Mr. Breazeale stated that one of the main points Sheriff Matlack would like to discuss is rotation of deputies through the county instead of dedicated officers exclusively to Heppner.  This would provide experience for personnel and avoid officers leaving the department in order to get more experience.  According to Mr. Breazeale the City would like a person dedicated to a set number of hours in Heppner. 

 

      Sheriff Matlack had stated to the Police Commission that he would like flexibility to operate under the contract.  He also wants to discuss other issues such as vehicle ownership and rotation as well as the process for assigning times for deputies in Heppner. 

 

      Mr. Baker encouraged Council members to get involved in this effort.  According to Mrs. Doherty, even if there was not a contract, Heppner would still have to be provided some coverage similar to the operation in Irrigon.  Mr. Wolff stated that he has talked with Under-Sheriff Myren about the rotation period and he was not sure of the period of time.  Mr. Wolff feels that six months would be doable since this would allow the deputies to be recognized by citizens.  Another issue was response time and ability to send officers to other parts of the county.  Mr. Wolff also discussed the issue of Heppner becoming a training zone.  The under sheriff conceded that one way to solve this is to join a rotation system throughout the entire department county-wide.  Under Sheriff Myren stated that he would agree to 120 hours per week and the same geographic coverage area as present.  Mr. Wolff agrees with Mr. Baker ‘s comments that Heppner is buying a package of services that the other cities in the County do not have. 

 

      Sheriff Matlack has also stated that the deputies being in Heppner for other reasons would count as their time being available in the City.  On the 120 hours per week, Deputy Rayburn stated that the City is currently getting more than 120 hours per week.  Other deputies have been called out on disturbances in Heppner.  He doesn’t want this to turn into more hours spent in Heppner.  He feels that the other deputies are still working even though they are in Heppner for other reasons.  He doesn’t want Heppner to be a training ground in the sense that the community is a different environment than the north end of the county. 

 

      Mr. Baker asked if the sheriff’s office will have some draft information to work with.  According to Sergeant Morris, there will be information provided for further discussion.  There is a March 1 deadline on this. 

 

      Deputy Rayburn stated that he would like Council members to attend the next Police Commission meeting.  According to Mr. Breazeale this would have to be advertised as a City Council work session.

 

      C)  Code Enforcements.  Deputy Rayburn intends to start a code enforcement action on the Smith property.           

 

      D)  Additional Discussion.  None.

 

6.  COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.

 

      A)  Activity Report – Bruce Nelson.

 

      Public Works Director Nelson reviewed the actions reported in the January Report.  There are some problems with the clay valve at the red barn.  The paint at the city yard came back clean and the paint was picked up by Hermiston Salvage.  Mr. Van Cleave added that he appreciated the written report. 

 

      B)  Biosolids Agreement.  Mr. Breazeale reported that this is a soil conditioner and the Jones have agreed to enter into an agreement for this.  In answer to Mr. Wolff’s question, Mr. Breazeale stated that this site is the same as the previous agreement and this agreement is a renewal.  Mr. Kuhn stated that this is the same agreement that has been used before and there have never been any conflicts.

 

      Motion by Mr. Wolff to move ahead with the agreement as stated with the correction of the number of years.  Seconded by Mrs. Doherty.  Motion Carried. 

 

      C)  Utilities Commission Meeting – Next meeting February 17.  Minutes of the January 20 meeting are included in the Council packet.

 

      D)  Parks and Lands Commission - next meeting scheduled for February 28. 

 

            1.  Hager Park Restroom Project.  Mr. Wolff stated that he had comments from citizens in the Hager Park area regarding construction of a restroom and Mr. Edmundson has assured Mr. Van Cleave that he will have a public meeting with the neighborhood citizens prior to making any recommendation.  Mr. Healy commented that he is one of the residents in the area.  According to Mr. Van Cleave, this proposition is in the early stages and the neighboring property owners will be contacted periodically throughout the project.  Mr. Baker stated that in his previous position with the State of Oregon he was aware of actions at Hager Park.  Most of the actions he was involved in were smaller projects.  Mr. Van Cleave asked if the location is dependent on the location of the sewer lines.  According to Mr. Nelson, the restroom site would be limited due to the sewer line locations.  The location Mr. Edmundson had proposed for this is not on City property, but on property that is owned by the Corps of Engineers.  According to Mr. Baker there could be problems with this.  Mr. Breazeale distributed the original plans for Hager Park which were proposed in 1973.  Mr. Baker stated that a neighborhood meeting needs to be held and a site plan selected prior to moving forward on the application process. 

 

      E)  Additional Discussion. 

 

            1.  Mr. Wolff inquired whether the City has had any further discussions with the Bank of Eastern Oregon and Murrays concerning on the old Gazette Times building.  According to Mr. Breazeale there have been some discussions but no formal offers.  Mr. Breazeale hopes to discuss this with the Parks and Lands Commission at their next meeting.  Murrays is looking at portion of the property (perhaps 10 feet) for loading for their store.  Mr. Estes has stated that this is not a problem for the fire department if an agreement can be reached. 

 

            2.  With reference to the water balance, a chart is included in the packet which compares water produced vs. water delivered and metered.  According to Mr. Nelson, by next Council meeting they should have an accurate report.  The clay valve has been sticking and that is the reason the most recent numbers are higher.  Mr. Wolff asked why the difference in the gallons pumped is less this year than last year.  According to Mr. Nelson, this is due to leaks being repaired. 

 

7.  COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE FIRE CHIEF.

 

      A)  Fire Advisory Committee.  This meeting is scheduled for February 23.  There are a number of issues to be discussed. 

 

      B)  So far this year they have had one MVA and two working grass fires.

 

8.  COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE CITY MANAGER.

 

      A)  Flood Study – Status Report.  Mr. Breazeale reported earlier that they had preliminary numbers on the hydrology.  The numbers included in the report should be the final numbers after the report has been reviewed by the hydrologist for Michael Baker Engineers, the contractor for FEMA to do the quality control and assurance.  Some of the numbers have changed from those presented originally.  The numbers shown are the effective and revised drainage figures.  The last column shows the percent reduction between the two numbers.  The positive numbers indicate a reduced figure; a negative figure reflects an increase.  The increases are for very small drainages.  The first one is in Lexington, there are two in Ione, and one in Little Blackhorse Canyon.  The reason for this is that the hydrologist looked at historic thunderstorms that have occurred in the immediate area which have resulted in large flows in small canyons.  These increases are based on the last 100 years of records that have been kept.  Most of the Heppner flows have dropped substantially.  The big reduction is below the confluence of Hinton and Willow Creeks.  He expects the flood plain to be much narrower once the study is completed.  The study will be more accurate than the current information on record.

 

      Since the hydrology has taken more time to complete the quality control and assurance, the project may not be finalized until March or April of 2006. 

 

      B)  Community Rating System.  The City has turned in the application for premium reductions for those people that are already in the flood study area.  This should be completed in May, and Heppner should qualify for at least a 9 and possibly an 8 which would give a 10% reduction. 

 

      C)  Land Use Committee – UGB Adjustment Project Status Report.  Mr. Breazeale reported that the City is awaiting notification from the County to advise on how to proceed on this.  There is strong support for the adjustment from the golf course and all of but two of the property owners involved. 

 

      D)  Water Improvement Project Bid Award.  Mr. Breazeale reported that Opening bids were held on February 1, 2005.  ACE Consultants, Inc. has summarized the bids and furnished a bid tabulation sheet.  The low bidder was Moore Excavation at $2,535,918.00.  The engineers pointed out that this is below their estimate, but above the City budget figure for the project.  However, when the bids were let, all the bidders were informed that the City was going to stay with a set amount and that portions of the project might need to be cut to stay within this figure.  Potential cutbacks that could be done by the Public Works crews have been suggested.  The reductions are outlined in Ace’s letter.  The City is also considering cutting extensions on Baltimore and Center Streets and these could also be done by Public Works, manpower and time permitting.  Consideration is being given to adding some bridge crossings and deleting the Baltimore and Center extensions.  The bridge crossing in back of the dam is a particularly high priority. 

 

      The engineer recommends that Council award the contract to Moore Excavation, but cut the project by $240,000.  The City intends to stay at the budget figure.  Ace Consultants recommends authorizing the City administrator negotiate a change at the time of the contract signing which would reduce the contract amount by $240,000.  If there is money remaining in the contingency ($197,000), and once the project is nearing completion, this could be used to build back some of the deleted items so that we stay right at the budget figure. 

 

      According to Mr. Kuhn, the contract lets us do this for the same price.  The change order would drop these items and if they are put back in, they may not come back at the same price due to inflation. 

 

      Mr. Wolff asked about the Hill Street and Green Street water mains, services, and hydrants being dropped from the contract since the City has done considerable work on these streets.  According to Mr. Nelson his crews have a full schedule and they can add this to their list.  Mr. Wolff would like this included in the contract and another item dropped.  Mr. Breazeale stated that they have tried to remove the lowest priorities from the list.  Mr. Van Cleave asked if there are any other dead-end streets included in the project and Mr. Breazeale stated there weren’t.  Mr. Wolff asked if the $2,535,918.00 reflected today’s pricing for pipe and what benefit would the city get.  According to Mr. Breazeale, this locks us in with the bid submitted, unless something would be cut back and then later added back in. 

 

      Motion by Mr. Wolff to award the contract to Moore Excavation in the amount of $2,535,918 and authorize the City administrator to negotiate a change order at the time of contract signing to reduce the contract amount by $240,000.  Seconded by Mrs. Doherty. 

 

Mr. Wolff asked if any local subcontractors will be used.  According to Mr. Van Cleave he has talked to Roger Britt and Moore is the only contractor who had contacted him.  Mr. Wolff asked if Ace Consultants is acquainted with Moore Excavating and familiar with their work.  According to Mr. Breazeale, Ace has checked on their work; they have done some work for the City of Portland and the City of Portland was satisfied with their work.  The only caution was that one of the supervisors tended to get a little aggressive. 

 

Question:  Motion Carried.

 

Mr. Healy asked if Nate Arbogast was furnished a copy of the work plan that shows where streets would be dug up because if there was any opportunity for him to put his lines in the open ditches, it would prevent digging up the streets again.  Mr. Breazeale stated that Mr. Arbogast could be given a copy of the plan. 

 

Mr. Wolff asked about the proposed schedule under Moore Excavation’s bid.  Mr. Breazeale stated they would probably start the project in March and complete within 300 days.  According to Mr. Breazeale, there will be some inconvenience for residents due to the short construction time and amount of work to be done. 

 

Mr. Breazeale intends to publish an article in the City Newsletter outlining what people should expect during the construction. 

 

      E)  Morrow Leadership 2005, Funding for Dinner for Participants.  According to Mr. Brezazeale, in the past, the City has provided dinner for the participants.  The cost should be less than $500.00.  So far, the participants are satisfied with the program.  There are six people from Heppner participating. 

 

Motion by Mrs. Buschke that the City fund the dinner for the participants in the Morrow Leadership 2005 program.  Seconded by Mrs. Doherty.  Motion Carried. 

 

      F)  Resolution No. _____, A Resolution Approving Accounts Payable for Payment.  Mr. Wolff questioned the following bills:

 

            1.  Bank of Eastern Oregon VISA Bill.

            2.  Columbia River Title.  According to Mr. Breazeale, this was for a lot book search for the Breeding property.

            3.  Coppock Surveying.  According to Mr. Breazeale, this was for an easement to go across school property and county property at the bridge by the fairgrounds.  This is part of the water improvement project.

            4.  D&L Auto Parts Repair.  Mr. Breazeale stated that this was for the fire department.

            5.  LH Morris Electric, Inc.  Mr. Breazeale stated that this was for the telemetry system computer and program.

            6.  Rural Development Initiatives, Inc.  Mr. Breazeale stated that this was the grant money from Ford Family Foundation that is passed through the account to pay RDI for the training.  There is a $10,000 grant from Ford Family Foundation. 

Motion by Mr. Wolff to approve Accounts Payable as listed, Resolution No. 592-05.  Seconded by Mrs. Buschke.  Motion Carried.

 

      G)  January Financial Statement.  According to Mr. Breazeale, everything is on track.

 

9.  COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ATTORNEY

 

      A)  Windwave Franchise Agreement.  Mr. Kuhn stated that he has reviewed the document for risk management.  The last two items he was concerned with were liability provisions.  The liability provisions he was using come from the League of Oregon Cities model franchise ordinance.  This is the one that the City has used for previous agreements and also the one that CBEC has.  Mr. Kuhn had discussed this with Mr. Breazeale and Mr. Breazeale felt the liability provisions could be relaxed, so with those exceptions and the caveat that Mr. Kuhn has fully advised the City, he recommends that the City adopt the WindWave and Inland Development franchises.  The WindWave agreement is for commercial telecommunications (for profit) Inland Development covers the commercial telecommunications (not for profit).

 

      Mr. Kuhn also recommends sending the same agreement to CenturyTel since their agreement expires.  This will increase their fees to the City due to the way gross revenue is defined.     Mr. Breazeale explained the indemnity clause in the agreements which is that the franchisee would be held harmless for damaging the City equipment, and vice versa.  This would protect both the City and the Franchisee. 

 

No action taken at this meeting since the agreements need to be advertised and reviewed by City Council.

 

      B)  Port of Morrow Lease.  According to Mr. Kuhn, this is a revised lease to be approved by the Port of Morrow.  The provisions that the Port wanted in the lease are:  1)  If a tenant was not found within one year, the property would revert back to the Port, and 2)  The property could not be sub-leased.  Mr. Kuhn wants the first provision deleted, and the sub-leasing provision would protect the City since the original intent was to sub-lease the property once the building was constructed.  It was noted that the original lease was signed previously.

 

      C)  Measure 37 Developments.  Mr. Kuhn discussed the current actions throughout the state on Measure 37.  There have been over 200 claims filed in Oregon at this time. 

 

      D)  Mr. Baker requested advance copies of any agreements that were to come before the Council so they could be reviewed before the meeting.  According to Mr. Kuhn the documents discussed would not be acted on until the next Council meeting, so there is plenty of time for review.  Mr. Van Cleave stated that in most cases, Mr. Kuhn provides the information in a timely manner.

 

10.  COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE MAYOR/CITY COUNCILORS

 

      A)  Resolution No. ________ A Resolution Adopting 2005 City Goals. 

 

      Mr. Van Cleave stated that two different versions of the 2005 City Goals which were set at the January 24 meeting were included in the packet.  Version A-1 is the Goals established at the session.  Version A-I is a modified version of these goals.  According to Mr. Breazeale, A-1 is a close interpretation of the goals determined at the Goal-Setting session, and Version A-I is broken down into the different parts of the infrastructure with a couple of goals added.  The goals that were added are:

      1)  Replace roof at Well 1 – materials are on hand.

      2)  Install a pressure sustaining valve on the feed line to better serve customers above Reservoir 1.  Parts are available.  Previously a pressure reducing valve was installed with the project by the Corps of Engineers to build the reservoir in its present location.  It has never been used.  By changing the pilot valve on this it can be changed to a pressure sustaining valve which means we can hold the pressure on the back stream side which means it will allow us to put more pressure to customers on the upstream side of the valve.  This would benefit the customers.  This is ongoing.

      3)  Replacement of a trickling filter pump at the wastewater treatment plant.  This will cost approximately $4,000.  One of the trickling filter pumps was replaced with a submersible pump and new piping.  The other pump that has not been replaced has a leak in the pressure pipe where it pumps up to the trickling filter.

      4)  Public Safety.  Review Sheriff’s Department contract and support efforts to merge the Heppner Fire Department with the Heppner Rural Protection District to provide a seamless fire protection.

      5)  Pursue efforts to secure funding for an expanded fire hall.  (Through possible grants).

 

Discussion:  Mr. Wolff stated that he likes Exhibit A-1.  He is not comfortable with wording in Exhibit A-I.  He feels this is in violation with the trust in City Government.  He would like the Council to adopt Exhibit A-1 and in doing so acknowledge the items that have been installed in Exhibit A-I.  He feels that mentioning any new projects at this time is not good.  Mr. Estes stated that as regards the new fire hall, this would not cost the City any money to investigate this. 

 

Mrs. Doherty was in agreement with Exhibit A-1.  Mr. Van Cleave asked if the goals can be numbered, and Mrs. Doherty suggested an A, B, C format.  Mr. Baker suggested adding a statement that the goals are not listed in priority order. 

 

Motion by Mr. Wolff to approve Resolution 593-05 adopting 2005 City Goals as listed in Exhibit A-1.  Seconded by Mr. Baker.  Motion Carried.

 

Mr. Van Cleave asked when the next newsletter will be published, and Mr. Breazeale stated that it should be published by the end of February.

 

      B)  Beautification Commission.  Next meeting to be held March 10, 2005.

 

      C)  Heppner Housing Authority.  Next meeting February 28, 2005.

 

      D)  Personnel Committee.  Next meeting February 22, 2005.  According to Mr. Breazeale, this will be a work session to work on a contract for the City Manager.  Members are working on “cutting and pasting” items from sample contracts from other cities in order to prepare a final document.

 

      E)  Safety Committee.  Next meeting March 1, 2005.  The Safety Committee is a requirement of a recent walk-thru inspection and is required since there are volunteers working on various projects within the City.  Rusty Estes will also serve on the Safety Committee. 

 

      F)  Mayor/Councilor comments:

 

            1.  Mayoral Proclamation – City Cleanup Days.  Mr. Van Cleave read the proclamation declaring City Cleanup Days, March 1 through 13, 2005.

 

            2.  Personal Liability Exposure for Elected Officials.  This material was sent to the City by the League of Oregon Cities and is a reminder for elected officials that they are covered by City County Insurance Services during the performance of official duties. 

 

            3.  Mayoral Appointments.

 

            a.  Housing Authority:  Mayor Van Cleave stated that due to other commitments, Andrea Denton is not able to fulfill her duties on the Housing Authority board.  Mayor Van Cleave has asked Mr. Bob Jepsen to serve in her place.

 

            b.  Budget Committee:  Mayor Van Cleave stated that at this time, he does not have a name of an individual to serve on this.

 

Motion by Mrs. Buschke to ratify the appointment of Mr. Bob Jepsen to serve on the Housing Authority.  Seconded by Mr. Baker.  Motion Carried.

 

4.  Additional Comments:  None.

 

Meeting adjourned at 9:25 PM.